Plastic cages doors are a common feature of modern plastic concertina door systems, and they are often a welcome sight to guests.
But a new paper in the journal PLOS ONE shows that these cages could be vulnerable to bacterial infection.
In their paper, the researchers describe how they created an in vitro test tube containing the cells from an isolated bacteria that cause colitis and called it “The Microwaviruses Test Tube.”
In their study, the authors used the bacteria to grow a plastic cage door and the plastic cages door.
As a control, they also made a plastic window.
After incubation, the plastic cage doors were inoculated with the bacteria, which had a similar phenotype to that of the bacteria.
When they transferred the cells to an inoculated plastic cage, the cage door was more resistant to the bacteria’s infection.
The researchers then injected the bacteria with the cells and observed that the bacteria were more resistant when the cage doors contained the cells.
The cages door had a 60% higher survival rate when they were made from cells grown from the same cell culture.
This suggests that the cells inside the cells of the plastic box could be more resistant than the cells on the outside of the cage.
The authors believe that these results could be important to better design the design of future plastic cages, because the cells in the cage could be susceptible to bacterial contamination.
“The cells of a cell culture have a very different genome from the cells that come from the cell culture,” said Dr. James J. Bochenek, a cell biologist at the University of Michigan.
“This may be what makes these cells more susceptible to infection.”
In a previous study, Bochenk and his colleagues found that the cell cultures in the glass cages of the glass-fronted Concertina concertina glass were resistant to bacteria that had been transferred to the cage glass.
These cells were not as resilient as those grown in plastic cages.
In fact, the cells were less likely to survive the transfer when the cells grew from the glass cage.
Bochench said that it’s important to test the potential of cells grown in cages with a different DNA structure, because these cells could be potentially more susceptible.
The next step is to test these cells for antibiotic resistance, which could help in designing new plastic cage designs.
The findings of the PLOS paper could have practical implications for people who live in countries where plastic cages are not permitted.
In China, where plastic cage production is widespread, many people are not allowed to use plastic cages because of the health risks.
In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration has also said that plastic cages can be a health risk.
However, Bichenk said that the paper could be a start to finding new ways to design cage-free systems.
“This is one of the first things we can do to try to make plastic cages safer and more appealing,” Bicench said.
“We have to try new things and look for new solutions.”
Follow Stories Like This Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.